I gotta admit, I was a Honda devotee before I bought the WRF. I wish i could say that Honda now had a competitior to the WRF available, but AFAIK, you still (3 years and counting) cant get a CRF250X :jawdrop:.
I am an old fart now, 42 years old this year (2004.) Back when I was racing fulltime in pre-1984, I had a few bikes most all of the time. One year in particular I remember having an 84 CR125 and an 84 XR200. I bought the XR for a pit bike basically. One day the CR was not running right (blew it out during practice I guess) and when race time rolled around I was allowed to use my XR200. It was box stock. I ended up running faster laptimes though the lack of accelleration was what kept me from winning. I still trophied against all the KX, YZ RM and other CR's. I love the way a 4-stroke handles braking. You don't even need brakes and you are practically always in the right gear. I wish 4-stroke technology would have been there when I was racing. There is no way I would have raced anything else.
But I've had over 5000km/s and a year and a half of riding on it.
After they get the bugs Ironed out, it will be tough to choose between the CRF and the WRF now ;-(
Good to see they are finally available to the public!!!
out of all of the bikes listed i would prefer the wr 250f. all other bikes you a restricted to the tracks unless you pay another 1000 bucks to get it recreationly registered. the wr can be set up for both on track and trail riding, it is the best all round bike. yamaha made a good move when they brought the 4 stroke enduro comp bikes out.
Im 13 years old and i used to have a honda xr100 but then i decided to get a 250 , wasnt sure. it was between the xr250 and the wr250f. luckily i picked the wr250f (de slugged and then some), i love this bike soo much, i rode an xr250 after i bought my bike and its slow!! and slugish, the 250 is a big bike for me but i FLY ON IT and i was wondering if anyone had tested their 250f for hp and speed, ive gone full speed on my bike i just dont no how fast that is
My dad has a WR250F n he said it would do about 110 mph the most which is pretty fast n i got a TT-R 125L n it is pretty fast to..i think that is the best bike i have ever had!!! honda is alright..kawasaki no way....susuki sucks YAMAHA IS THE BEST EVER
kawasaki rules HONDA SUX
kawasaki rules HONDA SUX
friggin wrong HONDA kicks eve
friggin wrong HONDA kicks everyones arse!!! and have to admit yamaha aswell
Honda Rules?
I gotta admit, I was a Honda devotee before I bought the WRF. I wish i could say that Honda now had a competitior to the WRF available, but AFAIK, you still (3 years and counting) cant get a CRF250X :jawdrop:.
KX250F
Well, the KX250F must be a bit of a rocket, but then again, Paul Broomfield is freaky.
Check this story: http://www.fullnoise.com.au/news/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_full&news… and the results at the bottom, Broomfield rode a 250F against 250 two strokes and came out second!
An excellent result for the Green Machine.
yea rite fag
honda and kawasaki both suck yamaha yz250f is the shit hands down
What I like about 4-Strokes
I am an old fart now, 42 years old this year (2004.) Back when I was racing fulltime in pre-1984, I had a few bikes most all of the time. One year in particular I remember having an 84 CR125 and an 84 XR200. I bought the XR for a pit bike basically. One day the CR was not running right (blew it out during practice I guess) and when race time rolled around I was allowed to use my XR200. It was box stock. I ended up running faster laptimes though the lack of accelleration was what kept me from winning. I still trophied against all the KX, YZ RM and other CR's. I love the way a 4-stroke handles braking. You don't even need brakes and you are practically always in the right gear. I wish 4-stroke technology would have been there when I was racing. There is no way I would have raced anything else.
WANNA RACE
MY CRF250x will stomp your wr bud.
That may be
But I've had over 5000km/s and a year and a half of riding on it.
After they get the bugs Ironed out, it will be tough to choose between the CRF and the WRF now ;-(
Good to see they are finally available to the public!!!
Go Honda!!
(OOps, I slipped)
WR 250F
out of all of the bikes listed i would prefer the wr 250f. all other bikes you a restricted to the tracks unless you pay another 1000 bucks to get it recreationly registered. the wr can be set up for both on track and trail riding, it is the best all round bike. yamaha made a good move when they brought the 4 stroke enduro comp bikes out.
kx 250 are better hondas suck
kx 250 are better hondas suck
NO THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL
NO THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL THAT HONDA COULD BEAT YAMAHA THIS IS A JOKE YAMAHA IS THE BEST AND WILL ALWAYS BE THE BEST.
SORRY I THINK YOU MEANT
SORRY I THINK YOU MEANT GO YAMAHA
yamaha or honda
Im 13 years old and i used to have a honda xr100 but then i decided to get a 250 , wasnt sure. it was between the xr250 and the wr250f. luckily i picked the wr250f (de slugged and then some), i love this bike soo much, i rode an xr250 after i bought my bike and its slow!! and slugish, the 250 is a big bike for me but i FLY ON IT and i was wondering if anyone had tested their 250f for hp and speed, ive gone full speed on my bike i just dont no how fast that is
my dad has a WR250F
My dad has a WR250F n he said it would do about 110 mph the most which is pretty fast n i got a TT-R 125L n it is pretty fast to..i think that is the best bike i have ever had!!! honda is alright..kawasaki no way....susuki sucks YAMAHA IS THE BEST EVER